Showing posts with label Laurel and Hardy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Laurel and Hardy. Show all posts

Sunday, August 9, 2009

30 questions-questionnaire (Thinking caps on!)


One of the most prominent blog Gods, Matthew Coniam, announced a more retro self-made film quiz at his blog Movietone News.
He advices us to put on our thinking caps, and I bet it's needed. A big one. I'll borrow Dorothy Gish's thinking hat, it looks like it has room for many ideas. (Or perhaps she just tries to hide her hydrocephalus.)



1. Your favourite Humphrey Bogart film in which he doesn't play a gangster or a private eye. (Oh, and not including Casablanca either.)

I'd vote for his violent and disillusioned screenwright Dixon Steele in In a Lonely Place (1950). He looks good with a stunning Gloria Grahame on his arm. Or under it.

2. Your favourite appearance by a star in drag (boy-girl or girl-boy).

Even though I haven't seen the film yet (hit me relentlessly for it), Katharine Hepburn in Sylvia Scarlett (1935) seems really cool. But if I should choose a star in drag I've actually seen, it'll have to be Cary Grant in previously mentioned Hepburn's fluffy dressing gown, jumping in the air and shouting "Because I just went gay, all of a sudden!" in Bringing Up Baby (1938).





3. Your favourite Laurel & Hardy film; short or feature, or one of each. (This will sort out the men from the boys - or perhaps the men from the girls.)

I have to disappoint you, I'm no man. I confuse all the titles on the Laurel & Hardy films/shorts - I really don't have an answer. But I like their commercial for wooden products - I mean, I can't be the only one who thinks the question "Wood - got any?" is funny, right?




4. Your favourite appearance by one star in a role strongly associated with another star. (Eg: Ricardo Cortez as Sam Spade, Grace Kelly as Tracy Lord, Vince Vaughn as Norman Bates...)

It wouldn't be too funny of me to choose Cortez now, would it?
I'll go with Mae Clarke as the prostitute Myra Beauville in the 1931 version of Waterloo Bridge (my film review here), a role that is a lot more connected with Vivien Leigh in the 1940 version. Leigh is beautiful and a really great actress, but that darned Code censored the sad-prostitute-part of the script, and turned Myra into a sweet little ballerina instead.
Mae Clarke should have been awarded with an Oscar.

5. The thirties or forties star or stars you most think you'd like, but have yet to really get to know.

Actress: Gene Tierney. Actor: Melvyn Douglas.

6. Your favourite pre-Petrified Forest Bette Davis film.

Of Human Bondage (1934). The film wasn't great, but what Bette Davis made of her part is fantastic. She's almost creepy, and yet sad. And yet... very creepy.


One of Bette Davis's best freak-out scenes. It's not pretty!




7. Your favourite post-Mildred Pierce Joan Crawford film.

What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? (1962). Bette Davis steals most of the film, but the film wouldn't be as brilliant a psychological thriller as it is without a stainless collaboration between the two actresses (at least on-screen).

8. Your favourite film that ends with the main character's death.

That's hard to choose, since every cool woman on-screen after 1934 had to be punished with her death for her awesomeness. Perhaps Anna Karenina (1935) with Greta Garbo throwing herself in front of a train?

9. Your favourite Chaplin talkie.

It's hard to choose between Limelight (1952) and Monsieur Verdoux (1947). But gentleman-serial killer Mr. Verdoux is so damn cool (and it's the film I have the freshest memory of), I'll have to go with that one.


Scene: A great scene from Monsieur Verdoux - I can't believe audience at the time thought this was an improper subject for humour?




10. Your favourite British actor and actress.

Actor: Duh! Basil Rathbone. (Yes, he was born in South Africa, but tell me one man who is more British than him!) Actress: Vivien Leigh.

Hear my favourite British actors read love poems for each other:
http://www.basilrathbone.net/radio/mp3/lovepoems.mp3

11. Your favourite post-1960 appearance by a 1930's star.

Joan Blondell as the waitress Vi in Grease (1978). She's still very "Blondelly".

12. Dietrich or Garbo?

Tough one. Dietrich is darn cool, and closer to my personality than Garbo. (I'm not very dreamlike, religious or self-sacrificing, am I?) But still... Garbo is my country girl, and one of my first on-screen female icons. Garbo it is.

13. Karloff or Lugosi?

Lugosi. You can never beat "I am... Dra-koola..." and "I don't drink... vine." And hey, he later played Frankenstein's monster, even after having refused the 1931 offer for the part (Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man, 1943). And he became a lost, morphine addict who made his last screen appearances for none other than B-horror director Edward D. Wood Jr.
Oh, and he was buried in his Dracula cape. Now, that's devotion.

14. Chaplin or Keaton? (I know some of you will want to say both for all of the above. Me too. But you can't.)

Chaplin. But mostly because I have seen more of him than of Keaton. But that I have seen of Keaton has touched me on a different level, actually... No, I refuse to choose! They're too different - it's like choosing your favourite of wine or chocolate. I want them both, because they complete different parts of my soul. (Ain't that just beautiful?)




15. Your favourite star associated predominantly with the 1950's.

*** Warning! Cliché answer. ***
I have to be honest, right? (Well, no. But this time - just for the heck of it.) James Dean, he was my first classic film love affair. When I was 14 I watched his films over and over as soon as I came home from school. (No, I wasn't invited to any parties. At least I had my on-screen friends...)

16. Your favourite Melvyn Douglas movie.

I'm not so well-read on Douglas, I'm ashamed to say. I'll answer Ninotchka (1939). (Nobody could fake-laugh like Garbo.)

17. The box-office failure you most think should have been a success.

The Thief of Bagdad (1924). I was surprised to read that this masterpiece (produced by, co-written by and starring Douglas Fairbanks, directed by Raoul Walsh) was a disappoinment to the contemporary audience. Perhaps they just weren't ready.

18. Your favourite performance by an actor or actress playing drunk.

James Stewart in The Philadelphia Story (1940), no doubt about it! In the same film, Katharine Hepburn. They're really great at it. "Hello, Dexter! HELLO, GEORGE. Helloooo, Mike..."
But the best drunken scene in the film is of course when Stewart's Macualey Connor bursts in on Grant's C. K. Dexter Haven, gets the hick-ups and throws Grant off balance in his acting, who unintentionally starts to laugh.


Scene: Don't forget to keep an eye on Cary Grant's facial expressions!




19. Your favourite last scene of any thirties movie.

Impossible to answer, but I'll try. I simply love the last scene in Night Nurse (1931), where the good guy is an illegal bootlegger who lets our heroine (Barbara Stanwyck) know that he has informed some maffia friends of his that he "just didn't like Nick (Clark Gable's bad guy, the chauffeur) very much...". The film then cuts to a roaring ambulance, and we witness a couple of hospital employees talking about the body that was just picked up. "Was he a bootlegger?" "No, he was wearing a chauffeur's uniform."
That's brilliant. And of course it is, William A. 'Wild Bill' Wellman directed it.

20. Your favourite American non-comedy silent movie.

City Lights (1931), Sadie Thompson (1928) (review) or Beyond the Rocks (1922) (review).

21. Your favourite Jean Harlow performance.

Red-Headed Woman (1932). "Do it again - I like it! Do it AGAIN!" Jeez, she's crazy...

22. Your favourite remake. (Quizmaster's definition: second or later version of a work written as a movie, not a later adaptation of the same novel or play.)

The word "re-make" often make me shiver with fear, but I guess I can pick an old re-make and alleviate the pain a little bit. I will probably never like a re-make more than the original, at least there's no example of that that I can think of. But it can still be a favourite re-make, right?
Maybe it's cheating, because the director did a re-make of his own movie, but here it is: The Ten Commandments (1956) by Cecil B. DeMille. I've seen it so many times that I lost the count. DeMille made his original film, The Ten Commandments, in 1923. 30 years later it was a swell time to do a re-make. Special effects had improved, there was magnificent Technicolor to add to the cinematic experience. And then there's Yul Brynner as Rameses. Oh, god... (He's sexy.)

23. Your favourite Orson Welles performance in a film he did not direct, not including The Third Man.

The commercial for Paul Masson champagne. See below.


Remember - this is the man behind Citizen Kane (1941). And he has probably consumed a little too much of the product before shooting. (This is epic.)




24. Your favourite non-gangster or musical James Cagney film or performance.

Bill White's buddy Eddie in Other Men's Women (1931). He's sweet, cool and sympathetic. And of course, he's James Cagney. In other words, he has much too few scenes.


25. Your favourite Lubitsch movie.

Haven't seen enough of his work, but among those I've seen I choose the pre-code Trouble in Paradise (1932). The combination of Ernst Lubitsch, Kay Francis, Miriam Hopkins and Herbert Marshall is hard to beat. (And how did poor Herbert manage to choose between Francis and Hopkins?)

26. Who would win in a fight: Miriam Hopkins or Barbara Stanwyck? (Both in their prime; say in 1934 or so.)

Hmm... Hopkins obviously has the sharp cat claws, but Stanwyck can fight like a man. I'd say that Stanwyck would win with a knock-out.

27. Name the two stars you most regret never having co-starred with each other, and - if you want - choose your dream scenario for them. (Quizmaster's qualification: they have to be sufficiently contemporary to make it possible. So, yes to Cary Grant and Lon Chaney Jr as two conmen in a Howard Hawks screwball; no to Clara Bow and Kirsten Dunst as twin sisters on the run from prohibition agents in twenties Chicago, much though that may entice.)

I'd like to see a pre-code triangle drama on bisexuality. It's 1932. Katharine Hepburn (in her break-through role) and Kay Francis live together in a posh New York apartment, when they meet the charming bootlegger Robert Montgomery who blows their minds. Hepburn's and Francis's relationship, as well as their social position, are now at stake.
This complicated romantic comedy/drama is directed by George Cukor.

28. Your favourite Lionel Barrymore performance.

Oh, that wonderful actor! It's hard to choose between his sadistic/perverted priest in Sadie Thompson (1928), his timid dying old man in Grand Hotel (1932) (review), his not so timid dying old man in Dinner at Eight and his intoxicated lawyer in A Free Soul (with that record-breaking, monstrous monologue in the last courtroom scene) - But I'll go ahead and answer this: The merciless Mr. Potter in It's a Wonderful Life (1946).

29. Bob Hope and Paulette Goddard or Bob Hope and Dorothy Lamour? (See note on question 14.)

He obviously co-starred a lot more with Dorothy Lamour than with Paulette Goddard, and the latter one has always been connected to Chaplin only in my eyes - so I'd say Bob Hope and Dorothy Lamour.




30. You won't want to answer this, but: there's been a terrible fire raging in the film libraries of all the major studios. It's far too late to save everything. All you can do is save as much as you can. You've been assigned the thirties. All you'll have time to drag from the obliterating inferno is one 1930's film each from Paramount, MGM, RKO, Columbia, Universal and Warners. Do you stomp around in a film buff's huff saying 'it's too hard, I can't choose just one' and watch them all go up in smoke? Or do you roll your sleeves up and start saving movies?
But if the latter: which ones...?

I definitively wouldn't stand there and see everything go up in smoke! And I guess bringing a fire-extinguisher isn't an option? That wouldn't be funny, would it? (Even though the rest of the world probably would thank me for it. But they are not going to have it that good!)
Here we go. I have focused on entertaining pre-code films, they seem most important. (And since I'm the saviour of these films, I can let myself be very egoistic.)

Paramount: Monkey Business (1931) Marx Brothers for everyone.
MGM: The Thin Man (1934) No doubt about it! Nick and Nora, yay!
RKO: Thirteen Women (1932) (Hey, we must have one B-movie in the list, so people won't think that all movies made in the 1930's were brilliant!)
Columbia: It Happened One Night (1934) Of course.
Universal: Dracula (1931) It's a bit more sophisticated than Frankenstein (1931). So sue me.
Warner Bros: Baby Face (1933) A slutty Stanwyck that has to be saved to the world.


The Marx Brothers - who could live without them?


Thursday, May 28, 2009

The Stolen Jools (1931)


The Stolen Jools (alt. The Slippery Pearls)
USA 1931
20 min

See it on The Internet Archive here.


This is that kind of film that is wonderfully amusing to read serious reviews about. "Lame excuse to put as many stars in a movie as possible" is one comment on IMDb. Oh yes, raising funds for the National Variety Artists Tuberculosis Sanitarium is a really lame excuse to appear in a motion picture for. (Notice that the film is in "co-operation with Chesterfield Cigarettes"...)

Anyway, this is a short, entertaining film stuffed with some of the greatest stars of that day. Let me describe the very simple story for you.

The films begins with a police officer, played by Wallace Beery, answering the office phone.
"What? A murder? That ain't news, we had three yesterday."
Let go for that. But at a Hollywood party the day before, Norma Shearer got her jewels stolen (or the gangsters Edward G. Robinson and George E. Stone got them stolen after stealing them from her) - now that's urgent business! Beery collects his men (one of them, Buster Keaton) and sends out a detective (Eddie Kane) to find out who among the Hollywood stars has the jewels.

Detective Kane investigates the many Hollywood stars (among them El Brendel, playing a Swedish waiter with an unplacable accent), until child star Mitzi Green solves the case:
"Mitzi, you just saved the plot of the story!"
"And the moral of this story is: Never spank a child on an empty stomach! [horrendous laughter]"

Now, how can you not love that? Maybe if you're that kind of person who only allows himself/herself to enjoy sophisticated, well-planned comedy, in fear that a cheap laugh might undermine his/her intelligence. I enjoyed it, and it seems like a lot of the actors did too.

And here's a part of the cast!


Wallace Beery, as the Police Sergeant

Buster Keaton, as a police man.


Stan Laurel and Oliver Hardy, as policemen.


Norma Shearer, as herself.

Hedda Hopper, as herself.

Joan Crawford, as herself.

William Haines, as himself.

Dorothy Lee, as herself.

Victor McLaglen, as himself.

El Brendel, as the Swedish waiter.

Winnie Lightner, as herself.

Fifi D'Orsay, as herself.

Warner Baxter, as himself.

Irene Dunne, as herself.

Bert Wheeler and Robert Woolsey, as themselves.

Claudia Dell, as herself.

Eugene Pallette, as a Reporter.

Gary Cooper, as a Reporter (named Cooper).


Maurice Chevalier, as himself.


Loretta Young, as herself.

Richard Barthelmess, as himself.

Bebe Daniels, as herself.

Joe E. Brown, as himself (uncredited).

Barbara Stanwyck, as herself.

Fay Wray, as herself.

Mitzi Green, as herself.

Monday, February 16, 2009

Stan (2006)



Stan
Director: Jon Sen
United Kingdom 2006
59 min


Stan is a film based on Neil Brand's radio play (broadcasted 2004) with the same name.
The TV film deals with the last time Stan Laurel (played by Jim Norton and Nik Howden) meets his life long friend and partner Oliver "Babe" Hardy (Trevor Cooper and Mike Goodenough), who lies paralyzed in bed and unable to talk after suffering a massive stroke.
Stan is obviously uncomfortable dealing with situations he can't control, which also is shown in several glimpses of his life in retrospect.



The plot jumps between scenes in Babe's bedroom and scenes in their past. We see how they meet, how their careers are built, rising and decaying, but above all how their friendship is built and only grows stronger over the years.



Stan is a lovely little piece of art, both moving and amusing. The director has been innovative, he doesn't seem to have run out of new and different ways to change the scene, connecting the past and the present and besides that experimenting with the pictorial language.

I strongly recommend this sweet little tale, though it seems to be a little difficult to get a hold of. But it sure is worth it.